Cognitive Jury Simulation

Know Your Verdict Before Trial

AI jurors who think, remember, feel, and deliberate - calibrated to your venue, exposed to local news, verifiable against Census data.

13
Cognitive Layers
41K+
U.S. ZIP Codes
100%
Airgapped Option
Census
Verified Demographics
What Makes This Different

Not Demographic Filters. Cognitive Terrain.

❌ What Competitors Do

  • 👤

    Generic Personas

    "52-year-old white male homeowner" - a demographic label, not a mind.

  • 🔄

    Stateless Responses

    No memory between prompts. Can't track opinion shifts across deliberation.

  • ☁️

    Cloud APIs

    Your privileged case data sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google servers.

✓ What Synthros Does

  • 🧠

    Cognitive Agents

    Gerald Kowalski - who read about local truck accidents this morning and whose brother's insurance claim was denied last year.

  • 💭

    Persistent Memory

    13-layer architecture with short-term memory, long-term memory, emotional drift, and private inner monologue.

  • 🔒

    100% Airgapped

    Your data never leaves your infrastructure. Zero external API calls.

Civic Twins Technology

Your Jurors Know Local News

Real jurors don't exist in a vacuum. They've seen local headlines, heard community conversations, experienced regional events. So do ours.

📍

Miami-Dade Trucking Case

Your AI jurors have seen coverage of I-95 accidents. They've noticed the billboard lawyer ads. That context shapes how they hear your evidence.

📍

Cook County Medical Malpractice

Jurors have absorbed Chicago's healthcare debates, insurance frustrations, and community sentiment about hospitals.

📊 Census-Verified Demographics

We don't invent demographics. We import them from the U.S. Census Bureau. Your synthetic population is statistically identical to the real one.

41K+
ZIP Codes
100%
Verifiable

Age, income, education, race, occupation, household type - all matched to Census.gov data for your trial venue.

Before Trial

Jurors Arrive With 30 Days of Context

Before jury selection, every synthetic juror has "lived" in your venue for the past 30 days - consuming local news, scrolling social media, and talking to friends.

Day -28
Local News
"FMCSA fines regional trucking company $2.3M for safety violations"
Day -21
TikTok - Viral Video (2.1M views)
"Dashcam footage shows semi driver texting before near-miss on highway"
Day -14
Local Radio
"Insurance companies denying legitimate claims: What you need to know"
Day -7
Facebook - Community Group
"My cousin got hit by a delivery truck and the insurance offered $15K for a broken spine"
Day 0
Courthouse
Jurors arrive with 30 days of context already shaping their beliefs

🏰 This Is Our Moat

Competitors model jurors as static profiles. We model jurors as citizens who have lived through the same information environment as your real jury pool.

What We Inject:

  • 📰 Local news - Headlines, TV segments, radio
  • 📱 Social media - TikTok, X, Facebook, Instagram
  • 💬 Community conversations - Work, church, home
  • ⚖️ Pretrial publicity - If your case made news
  • 🗳️ Political climate - Elections, protests, civic mood
Step 1: Generate Jury Pool

48 Synthetic Jurors, Census-Calibrated

Each juror has demographics, personality, beliefs, life experiences, and 30 days of context - matched to actual Census data for your venue.

MR
Maria Rodriguez
34yo Female - Hispanic
💼 Nurse (ER)
🎓 Bachelor's Degree
💰 $65K-$85K
⚠️ HIGH RISK Democrat
Plaintiff Affinity 87%
TJ
Terrence Jackson
52yo Male - Black
💼 Retired Teacher
🎓 Master's Degree
💰 $45K-$65K
⚠️ HIGH RISK Democrat
Plaintiff Affinity 82%
CP
Carlos Perez
41yo Male - Hispanic
💼 Small Business Owner
🎓 Some College
💰 $85K-$125K
MEDIUM Independent
Plaintiff Affinity 58%
RW
Robert Wilson
58yo Male - White
💼 Engineer (Retired)
🎓 Master's Degree
💰 $125K+
✓ LOW RISK Republican
Plaintiff Affinity 31%

Showing 4 of 48 jurors - Full panel available in platform

Deep Dive

Why is Maria Rodriguez High Risk?

MR
Maria Rodriguez
34yo Female - Hispanic - ER Nurse
Plaintiff Affinity
87%

🚨 Risk Factors

  • Medical professional - will anchor high on injury damages
  • ER experience - sees trauma daily, empathizes with plaintiff
  • Prior lawsuit - sued former employer (won)
  • High agreeableness - susceptible to emotional arguments
  • Low corporate trust - believes companies prioritize profit over safety
  • Recent media - shared viral trucking video 3 weeks ago

📊 Simulation Data

89%
Votes Plaintiff
$1.1M
Avg Award
14
Simulations

💬 From Deliberation Transcript

"I've seen injuries like this in the ER. People don't understand how much a back injury affects your whole life. The defense kept saying 'she can still walk' like that means she's fine. She's 34 years old and she'll never run with her kids again. That's worth more than medical bills."

Result: Maria pushed for $1.4M. Final jury award: $925K (she compromised down from her anchor).

The Impact

What Happens When You Strike the Right Jurors?

Before Strikes

85%
Plaintiff Win Probability
$780K median

After 6 Strategic Strikes

68%
Plaintiff Win Probability
$520K median

⛔ Struck (6 Jurors)

  1. Maria Rodriguez - ER Nurse, 87% plaintiff affinity
  2. Terrence Jackson - Retired teacher, prior lawsuit plaintiff
  3. Denise Williams - Social worker, high empathy scores
  4. Marcus Thompson - Personal injury history
  5. Angela Martinez - Insurance claim denied last year
  6. James Brown - Union member, anti-corporate views

✓ Kept (12 Jurors)

  • • 3 business owners (understand liability)
  • • 2 engineers (analytical, scrutinize evidence)
  • • 2 finance professionals (understand economics)
  • • 1 retired military (discipline, personal responsibility)
  • • 4 moderates with no red flags
Average plaintiff affinity: 41% (down from 58%)
The Killer Feature

Ask Any Juror: "Why Did You Vote That Way?"

After simulation, you can interrogate any juror. Understand their reasoning. Find out what argument would have changed their mind.

YOU
You
Maria, you voted for the plaintiff and pushed for $1.4M. Walk me through your thinking.
MR
Maria Rodriguez
I've worked in the ER for eight years. I've seen what spinal injuries do to people. The defense kept saying "she can still walk" like that means she's fine. She's 34 years old and she'll never run with her kids again. That's worth more than medical bills.
YOU
You
What about the defense's argument that the plaintiff was also on her phone?
MR
Maria Rodriguez
Honestly? That felt desperate. A commercial truck rear-ended a stopped car. I don't care if she was texting - you don't hit someone from behind because they weren't paying attention. The truck driver should have been paying attention for both of them.

💡 What You Learn

  • Comparative fault didn't land - "desperate" argument
  • Life impact > medical bills - emotional anchor was "never run with her kids"
  • Commercial truck = higher standard - "should have been paying attention for both"

🎯 Strategic Takeaway

If Maria makes it onto your jury, the comparative fault argument won't work on her. You need a different angle - maybe focus on treatment gaps or pre-existing conditions instead.

Better yet: strike her and avoid the problem entirely.

Deliverables

What You Get Before Trial

📋 Strike List

  • Ranked list of jurors to strike
  • Specific risk factors for each
  • Plaintiff affinity scores
  • Simulation-backed data

✓ Keep List

  • Favorable juror profiles
  • Defense-leaning indicators
  • Analytical vs. emotional thinkers
  • Corporate trust levels

❓ Voir Dire Questions

  • Questions to unmask risk jurors
  • Tailored to case type
  • Red flag responses to watch
  • Cause challenge ammunition

📊 Verdict Prediction

  • Win/loss probability
  • Damages distribution
  • Settlement recommendation
  • Best/worst case scenarios

💬 Juror Interrogation

  • Post-simulation interviews
  • Understand juror reasoning
  • Find persuasion weak points
  • Test alternative arguments

🎯 Trial Strategy

  • Arguments that move the needle
  • Arguments that backfire
  • Witness credibility assessment
  • Damages anchoring strategy
📝

Works With Real Juror Data Too

When you receive actual voir dire questionnaires, enter the real juror data into the system. Same AI analysis. Same strike recommendations. Real jurors, real intelligence.

Deployment

Your Data Never Leaves

Litigation files contain privileged communications and work product. They stay on your infrastructure.

🔒

100% Airgapped

No external API calls. No cloud dependencies. The system runs entirely within your firewall.

🏢

On-Premise Option

Dedicated servers in your data center. You own the hardware. Full control.

🛡️

Privilege Protected

Attorney-client privilege maintained. Work product stays work product.

⚠️

Why This Matters

Other AI tools send your data to OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google. That means your privileged litigation strategy is sitting on someone else's servers. With Synthros, your data never leaves your building. For many organizations, this isn't just a feature - it's a compliance requirement.

Get Started

Ready to Know Your Verdict Before Trial?

Let's run your case through the system. See what we would have told you before your last trial.

1

Pilot Case

Send us a case - past or current. We run full simulation and deliver results.

2

Validate

Compare predictions to outcomes. Build confidence in the system with real results.

3

Scale

Roll out to your team. Every litigated file gets simulation.

to navigate